An A to Z of peer-to-peer writing

نویسنده

  • M John
چکیده

from your own language. The result would most probably be disastrous. However: better used at the beginning of a sentence followed by a comma. Avoid writing however in the middle of a sentence, where badly used commas can cause all sorts of problems. Impact factor: we all know what this is, but a journal with high impact factor is not necessarily your best bet when you want to publish a paper. What you should be aiming for is a guaranteed reading population that will lead to future citation. Jargon: avoid the use of over-technical language and endless acronyms, as well as pompous empty phrases that say nothing. Key words: choose them carefully as they are fundamental for electronic retrieval. Without key words (also in the title of your paper) you paper risks being lost in cyber-space. Long sentences: keep well away from these. Sentences should never be longer than 20 words otherwise they tend to get out of control, and can become difficult for both writers and readers alike. More research is needed: virtually all papers end with these words. Conclude your paper powerfully by giving a message, which quite simply is a sentence outlining the implications of your discoveries. Negatives: be careful with words like ei-ther/or and neither/nor, and remember that positive is better. Order: planning is of primary importance when you wish to communicate with members of your peer community. Use planning Acceptance: the moment when your work of genius will finally be published. Love it! Bad writing: often used as an excuse by reviewers and editors when they can't think of anything really bad to say about your data. Do not allow this to happen. Use the services of a native English speaker with specific knowledge of your field, and don't forget to mention this person in the acknowledgements. Covering letter: is the first thing the Editor of your target journal will see, and can therefore be a useful form of presentation when well written. Prepare it very carefully , and never write more than 250 words. Draft: getting things right the first time is virtually impossible for anyone. Therefore, do not waste time trying to write the perfect sentence: it will not happen. Get your ideas down on paper, and do the fine-tuning in the future drafts. Editors: give them what they want and always respect their decisions, whatever they might be. Figures: these, together with …

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Self-, Peer-, and Teacher-Assessments in Writing Improvement: A Study of Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency

Alternative assessment approaches and, among them, self-assessment and peer-assessment are becoming increasingly important in educational contexts. Designed to compare self-assessment, peer-assessment, and teacher-assessment, this study included 90 EFL students from 3 intact classes divided into 3 groups: self-assessment, peer-assessment, and teacher-assessment. After taking the TOEFL Proficien...

متن کامل

The Effect of Corrective Feedback on the Writing Accuracy of Feedback Givers and Receivers

This quasi-experimental study set out to examine the effect of peer corrective feedback on feedback givers and receivers in L2 writing. The forms in focus were a/an, the, and the past tense.The study was conducted in an EFL classroom setting with 45 learners of English in three writing classes which served as the feedback givers, receivers, and the control group.  Over four sessions of treatmen...

متن کامل

Traditional Versus Alternative Writing Assessment

The present study intended to evaluate EFL students' performance on a traditional method of writing assessment in comparison to an alternative assessment technique by taking into account the effects of teacher and peer feedback. Moreover, the attitudes of the participants regarding assessment procedures and activities were focused in this study. To this end, thirty male and female language lear...

متن کامل

Traditional Versus Alternative Writing Assessment

The present study intended to evaluate EFL students' performance on a traditional method of writing assessment in comparison to an alternative assessment technique by taking into account the effects of teacher and peer feedback. Moreover, the attitudes of the participants regarding assessment procedures and activities were focused in this study. To this end, thirty male and female language lear...

متن کامل

The Effects of Metacognitive Prompting and Structured Peer Interaction on Intermediate EFL learners' Collaborative Writing

This research was designed to investigate the effects of two different types of learningmodalities, namely Meta-cognitive Prompting and structured peer interaction on intermediateEFL learners’ collaborative writing. For this purpose, 90 learners of total number of 120intermediate learners studying at Kish English language school were chosen first forhomogenization prior to the study. In order t...

متن کامل

Iranian EFL Learners’ Reactions to Different Feedbacks in Writing Classrooms: Teacher Written Comments (TWC) vs. Peer Written Comments (PWC)

The teaching of writing has recently begun to move away from a concentration on the written product to an emphasis on the process of writing. Feedback is a fundamental element of the process approach to writing. It can be defined as input from a reader to a writer with the effect of providing information to the writer for a revision. This study reports on the effectiveness of two types of feedb...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013